|Minutes of university assessment
committee meeting Wednesday, March 1, 2000.
Earley, Sharon Hemmingson, Calhoon, O'Neill, Ellis,
Golliher, and Meyers; Absent: Grey, Cook, Haislett,
Myers, Termes, J. Miller.
The committee voted to approve the plan for the
environmental physical science major with the following
amendments. Dr. Anderson should make that goals 2, 3, 4
are measurable and change the word "enthusiasm"
in goal 5 to "preparation."
The committee began to discuss the reports of the
Back to Campus
|It became quite clear that
some would pass and some would not. At that point the
committee decided to ask Dr. Cook and the deans to come
meet with them at 3 p.m. on March 15th in Jonas 103.
intent is to discuss the following issues:
- What should be the standard for acceptance or
rejection of a report?
- If the report is accepted or rejected, then what?
- If a significant number of the reports fail, how
does this impact NCA accreditation?
- Can we get a separate report on each of the
majors in education?